Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication
underlying section 405.38 is to curtail misuse of the lis pendens procedure.”].)
As noted above, Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant failed to file an opposition or respond to the motion and therefore, has not shown that he acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of attorney’s fees unjust.
However, Cross-Complainants’ request for attorney’s fees includes time for reviewing the opposition and preparing a reply. Cross- Complainants’ Counsel did not have to engage in these tasks as Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant did not file an opposition.
The court will reduce the amount of attorney’s fees accordingly.
Cross-Complainants shall give notice of this ruling.
9 Kim vs. Williams Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication
30-2023-01317262 There is no written tentative ruling at this time. The court will hear from the parties or their counsel at hearing on this matter.
10 Sunday vs. Kazweeny Demurrers
Defendant Lightspeed Escrow, Inc.’s Demurrer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, Code of Civil 30-2025-01476760 Procedure § 430.41 is OVERRULED as to the 4th Cause of Action, and SUSTAINED with 15 days leave to amend as to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 7th Causes of Action.
Defendants Ahmed Kazweeny’s and Reeland Investments LLC’s Demurrer to Plaintiffs’ First [sic] Complaint, Code of Civil Procedure § 430.41 is OVERRULED as to the 1st and 4th Causes of Action, and SUSTAINED with 15 days leave to amend as to the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 7th Causes of Action.
If Plaintiffs Karen Sunday & Associates, Inc. and Karen Sunday do not amend the First Amended
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”