Court Receiver’s Motion for Order Approving Final Accounting Report & Discharge
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JUNE 15, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
No. 25CV02148
GARCIA v. LITTLE CAESAR’S OF SANTA CRUZ INC.
(UNOPPOSED) DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER
The demurrer is sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff filed an application to dismiss without prejudice her class claims and PAGA claim, which the Court granted. For clarity, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that eliminates those claims no later than July 2, 2026.
No. 23CV02508
PEOPLE ex rel. REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL COAST REGION v. BIG BASIN WATER COMPANY INC., et al.
(UNOPPOSED) COURT RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT & DISCHARGE
The unopposed motion is granted. The Court will sign the order submitted by the Receiver.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”