MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
June 12, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings
11. 26CV0193 CHRISHANA FIELDS VS. EL DORADO MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
On April 27, 2026, Defendants filed a Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and a Motion to Strike the same. Both motions were set to be heard on June 5, 2026, however prior to the hearing the court issued its tentative ruling finding that the notice did not comply with Local Rule 7.10.05. As such, the matter was continued to July 17, 2026 at 8:30am in Department 9.
In the interest of judicial economy, this matter is continued to join with the currently scheduled hearing on July 17, 2026 at 8:30am in Department 9.
TENTATIVE RULING #11: IN THE INTEREST OF JUDICIAL ECONOMY, THIS MATTER IS CONTINUED TO JOIN WITH THE CURRENTLY SCHEDULED HEARING ON JULY 17, 2026 AT 8:30AM IN DEPARTMENT 9.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999).
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.
LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE LONG CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING.
21
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”