DecisionDepot
California legal research
All attorneys

Paloma Acosta

Firm unspecified · 1 ruling ingested

First seen Aug 12, 2026 · last seen Aug 12, 2026

Ruling distribution
1
rulings
Win rate (Granted ÷ G+D)
Plaintiff vs Defendant
0 P · 1 D

Counties (1)

Judges appeared before (0)

Motion types — outcome distribution

Motion typeTotalGrantedDeniedGrant rate
Motion to Compel Further Responses1000%
Other1000%

Recent rulings (1)

CaseCountyJudgeRulingIndexedHearing
Varun Patibanda, et al. v. Daniel Patrick Foster, et al.
24CV002782
montereyPlaintiff's Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Defendant's Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED; Requests for monetary sanctions by each party regarding the Protective Order are DENIED.Aug 21, 2026Aug 12, 2026

Descriptive only — name normalization is imperfect (different counties may spell the same attorney differently). Verify before relying on counts.

Frequently asked questions

What is Paloma Acosta's record in California Superior Court?+

According to DecisionDepot's index of California Superior Court tentative rulings, Paloma Acosta appears in 1 indexed rulings with a — grant rate on contested motions. Data is drawn from publicly posted tentative rulings and may not reflect all matters.

Which California courts does Paloma Acosta appear in?+

Based on indexed tentative rulings, Paloma Acosta has appeared in 1 county: MONTEREY. The full list with case counts appears on this profile page.