| Attorney | Firm | Cases | Counties | Judges | Wins | Win rate |
|---|
| Case | County | Motion | Ruling | Hearing |
|---|
Firm unspecified · 6 rulings ingested
First seen Apr 16, 2025 · last seen May 7, 2025
| Motion type | Total | Granted | Denied | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motion to Compel Discovery | 6 | 4 | 0 | 67% |
| Case | County | Judge | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALL, et al. vs BIANCHI ESTATES LLC, et al. 24CV000150 | sacramento | Julie G. Yap | GRANTED | Jun 29, 2026 | May 7, 2025 |
| HALL, et al. vs BIANCHI ESTATES LLC, et al. 24CV000150 | sacramento | Julie G. Yap | GRANTED | Jun 29, 2026 | May 7, 2025 |
| HALL, et al. vs BIANCHI ESTATES LLC, et al. 24CV000150 | sacramento | Julie G. Yap | GRANTED | Jun 29, 2026 | May 7, 2025 |
| HALL, et al. vs BIANCHI ESTATES LLC, et al. 24CV000150 | sacramento | Julie G. Yap | GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; potentially DROPPED if service is found defective. |
Descriptive only — name normalization is imperfect (different counties may spell the same attorney differently). Verify before relying on counts.
According to DecisionDepot's index of California Superior Court tentative rulings, Lindsey Goulding appears in 6 indexed rulings with a 100% grant rate on contested motions. Data is drawn from publicly posted tentative rulings and may not reflect all matters.
Based on indexed tentative rulings, Lindsey Goulding has appeared in 1 county: SACRAMENTO. The full list with case counts appears on this profile page.
| Jun 29, 2026 |
| Apr 16, 2025 |
| HALL, et al. vs BIANCHI ESTATES LLC, et al. 24CV000150 | sacramento | Julie G. Yap | If Defendants show compliance with Section 1010.6, motion is GRANTED; otherwise, motion is DROPPED due to defective service. | Jun 29, 2026 | Apr 16, 2025 |
| HALL, et al. vs BIANCHI ESTATES LLC, et al. 24CV000150 | sacramento | Julie G. Yap | If service is defective, motion is DROPPED; if service is valid, motion is GRANTED as unopposed. | Jun 29, 2026 | Apr 16, 2025 |