| Attorney | Firm | Cases | Counties | Judges | Wins | Win rate |
|---|
| Case | County | Motion | Ruling | Hearing |
|---|
Firm unspecified · 1 ruling ingested
First seen Jun 3, 2026 · last seen Jun 3, 2026
| Motion type | Total | Granted | Denied | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Motion for Sanctions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Motion to Compel Discovery | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Case | County | Judge | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. David Jester et al v. Matt Ospeck et al 24CV000226 | napa | Cynthia P. Smith | Motion for RFA deemed admitted: DENIED. Motion for Monetary Sanctions: GRANTED. Motion to increase time for deposition: GRANTED. Motion to compel production: DENIED. | Jun 3, 2026 | Jun 3, 2026 |
Descriptive only — name normalization is imperfect (different counties may spell the same attorney differently). Verify before relying on counts.
According to DecisionDepot's index of California Superior Court tentative rulings, Lawrence Brocchini appears in 1 indexed rulings with a — grant rate on contested motions. Data is drawn from publicly posted tentative rulings and may not reflect all matters.
Based on indexed tentative rulings, Lawrence Brocchini has appeared in 1 county: NAPA. The full list with case counts appears on this profile page.