| Attorney | Firm | Cases | Counties | Judges | Wins | Win rate |
|---|
| Case | County | Motion | Ruling | Hearing |
|---|
Firm unspecified · 1 ruling ingested
First seen Jun 8, 2026 · last seen Jun 8, 2026
| Motion type | Total | Granted | Denied | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motion to Compel Discovery | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% |
| Motion to Deem Facts as Admitted | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% |
| Motion for Sanctions | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% |
| Case | County | Judge | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammar Ahmed Khan, et al. v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al. 23-CIV-05860 | sanmateo | David A. Silberman | GRANTED | Jun 5, 2026 | Jun 8, 2026 |
Descriptive only — name normalization is imperfect (different counties may spell the same attorney differently). Verify before relying on counts.
According to DecisionDepot's index of California Superior Court tentative rulings, Arthur H. Lampel appears in 1 indexed rulings with a 100% grant rate on contested motions. Data is drawn from publicly posted tentative rulings and may not reflect all matters.
Based on indexed tentative rulings, Arthur H. Lampel has appeared in 1 county: SANMATEO. The full list with case counts appears on this profile page.